Researchers see 66% decline in attacks over eight months since Microsoft turned off macros by default. Credit: ivanastar / Getty Iimages Microsoft’s decision to turn off Office macros by default has had a significant impact on the use of the mini-programs by hackers, according to enterprise security company Proofpoint. In a blog posted today, the company noted its researchers have found that the use of macro-enabled attachments by threat actors has decreased approximately 66% between October 2021 and June 2022.“We’ve seen them switch their tactics away from leveraging malicious macros into other kinds of attacks like LNK files,” says Proofpoint Vice President for Threat Research and Detection Sherrod DeGrippo. “We’ve seen a 1,600% increase over the past ten months or so around using other tactics aside from malicious Office macros. The threat actors got the message that this is coming and are stifling their use of macros against individuals and organizations.”Microsoft announced its intention to block Office macros by default in October 2021. At the beginning of July, it announced a temporary rollback of the move, but it reaffirmed the move on July 20. With the change, Microsoft explained in a company blog, users will receive a message that macro execution is blocked when they open files from sources not identified as trusted.“The defender community has been battling this for many years,” DeGrippo says. “Seeing Microsoft really take some action on something that has been a massive threat vector for years is great.” Microsoft move makes adversaries less successful“It’s a hugely important step Microsoft is taking to start blocking these macros by default, especially due to how invisible macros are to the majority of users,” adds Nathan Wenzler, chief security strategist at Tenable, a vulnerability scanning company. “But that doesn’t mean the threat is eradicated or we shouldn’t continue to remind users to be vigilant about opening files from untrusted sources.”Other companies are seeing threat actors switching tactics because of Microsoft’s move, too. “The adversaries are aware of it,” observes Tim Bandos, executive vice president of cybersecurity at Xcitium, a maker of an endpoint security suite. “They’re testing out new ways of working around it because they’re clearly not as successful now that Microsoft has made this change.” Users of one notorious malicious program, known as Emotet, have already begun shifting tactics, he notes. “We’ve seen them shift recently from leveraging macros to using URLs to OneDrive or Google Drive,” he says.One of the largest email threat landscape shiftsMatt Chiodi, chief trust officer at Cerby, maker of a platform to manage shadow IT, says Microsoft should be applauded for its action, but warned organizations need to be on the lookout for adversaries using alternatives to macros in their attacks. “Attackers will no doubt shift from VBA macro attacks to unmanageable applications that are currently outside the reach of IT and security,” he says.While Microsoft’s action is influencing the move by threat actors away from the use of macros, diversification has been going on for years, asserts Brian Donohue, principal information security specialist at Red Canary, a cloud-based security services provider. “There’s probably a confluence of factors driving these changes, which includes Microsoft’s long-stated plan to disable macros, increased scrutiny of macros across the industry, and more,” he says.In its blog, Proofpoint notes that the pivot away from macro-enabled documents has led to the adoption of ISO and other container file formats, as well as LNK files. Such filetypes, it explains, can bypass Microsoft’s macro-blocking protections as well as facilitate the distribution of executables that can lead to malware downloads, data reconnaissance and theft, and ransomware.According to Proofpoint, its researchers assessed with high confidence that this is one of the largest email threat landscape shifts in recent history. It is likely threat actors will continue to use container file formats to deliver malware, while relying less on macro-enabled attachments, it added. Related content news Chinese state actors behind espionage attacks on Southeast Asian government The distinct groups of activities formed three different clusters, each attributed to a specific APT group. By Shweta Sharma Sep 25, 2023 4 mins Advanced Persistent Threats Advanced Persistent Threats Cyberattacks feature How to pick the best endpoint detection and response solution EDR software has emerged as one of the preeminent tools in the CISO’s arsenal. Here’s what to look for and what to avoid when choosing EDR software. By Linda Rosencrance Sep 25, 2023 10 mins Intrusion Detection Software Security Monitoring Software Data and Information Security feature Top cybersecurity M&A deals for 2023 Fears of recession, rising interest rates, mass tech layoffs, and conservative spending trends are likely to make dealmakers cautious, but an ever-increasing need to defend against bigger and faster attacks will likely keep M&A activity steady in By CSO Staff Sep 22, 2023 24 mins Mergers and Acquisitions Data and Information Security IT Leadership brandpost Unmasking ransomware threat clusters: Why it matters to defenders Similar patterns of behavior among ransomware treat groups can help security teams better understand and prepare for attacks By Joan Goodchild Sep 21, 2023 3 mins Cybercrime Podcasts Videos Resources Events SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER From our editors straight to your inbox Get started by entering your email address below. Please enter a valid email address Subscribe