Americas

  • United States

Asia

Oceania

kacyzurkus
Writer

Is cell phone spoofing a mobile security risk [or just annoying]?

Opinion
Jun 19, 20174 mins
Mobile SecurityPrivacySecurity

Sprint responds to a customer's complaint of mobile phone calls and text messages from unknown callers. Here's what the carrier offers for advice.

Given that we all need to be more security-savvy and learn the behaviors of good cyber hygiene, I try to stay on alert when it comes to email messages and phone calls. 

One client told me I have been in the industry too long because I wouldn’t open a link he shared until I confirmed he actually intended to send it.

So, I know about email spoofing — that it is used for phishing campaigns — but I didn’t realize spoofing also happens on cell phones.

Maybe you, too, have answered the phone to hear a brief moment of pause before a woman explains she was just adjusting her headset. I’ve received it, a few times even. I’ve just hung up on her.

In the past few weeks, though, I’ve gotten a collection of random calls and texts from people who say, “I just missed a call from this number.” In fact, I’ve received three such calls today — all before noon — while I was on the phone with Sprint trying to report the issue.

Mysteriously, the calls that remain in my call log all come from a number that has the same area code and first three numbers of my cell phone number, but the last four digits are all different each time.

How to stop phone spoofing

When I called Sprint, I was concerned that my account had been hacked, but they, “didn’t see any suspicious activity,” according to Elena in customer service.

As I sat on hold, being transferred to three different people, I started Googling the issue. There have been chats on reddit, and AT&T reminds its customers to read their privacy guidelines. 

I asked if the security practitioners were aware of this issue, but Elena told me she’s only had calls from people reporting telemarketing concerns. Naturally, I asked what steps they take to communicate customer concerns about potential security breaches, and she said, “If you call again with this same matter, the next person will be able to see her notes in my account.”

But the concern that I’m reporting isn’t ever shared among the customer service representatives. And while I was the first person to make Elena aware of these spoofing calls, she has no idea whether anyone else has reported it to other representatives.

Then I was transferred to Sara, a manager, who said she was “unable to report this to the corporate security team because there is a process for security and incident reports.”

Oddly, Sara said, “The only time you can reach out to corporate security is if there has been a physical injury, as in an accident or assault, or something of that nature.”

Sprint’s media relations department responds to spoofing

That rule apparently applies only to customer service representatives because I did reach out to Sprint’s media relations department and received a swift response.

A Sprint representative wrote:

This appears to be spoofing and not a Sprint-specific issue. As the activity is prohibited by the FCC, they provide helpful information on their website which may be of interest to your readers, including how individuals can protect themselves and how to report suspicious calls.

Additionally, Sprint provides a service called Premium Caller ID. In November 2016, we announced an enhancement to that service so that customers can protect themselves from unwanted robocalls and caller ID spoofers. Here is a blog post outlining the details.

The blog post does indeed discuss solutions to spoofing, one of which is that you can  “elect to block the number in order to prevent future calls, and may also choose to report the call, which is used to help refine data via crowd-sourcing.”

The latter part of this advice was never conveyed in my first three conversations with anyone (including supervisors) in the customer service department. The very word spoofing was never even uttered. 

Yet, the blog goes on to claim,

“At Sprint, we strive to provide top-notch customer service, and today, we’re able to protect our customers from unwanted robocalls,” said Mark Yarkosky, Sprint’s director of product management. “Cequint has effectively created an important and needed solution to better providing mobile customers with better privacy and security.”

So, my question remains: Is spoofing a security risk, or is it just annoying?

kacyzurkus
Writer

Kacy Zurkus is a freelance writer for CSO and has contributed to several other publications including The Parallax, Meetmindful.com and K12 Tech Decisions. She covers a variety of security and risk topics as well as technology in education, privacy and dating. She has also self-published a memoir, Finding My Way Home: A Memoir about Life, Love, and Family under the pseudonym "C.K. O'Neil."

Zurkus has nearly 20 years experience as a high school teacher on English and holds an MFA in Creative Writing from Lesley University (2011). She earned a Master's in Education from University of Massachusetts (1999) and a BA in English from Regis College (1996). Recently, The University of Southern California invited Zurkus to give a guest lecture on social engineering.

The opinions expressed in this blog are those of Kacy Zurkus and do not necessarily represent those of IDG Communications, Inc., its parent, subsidiary or affiliated companies.

More from this author