• United States



Contributing Writer

Endpoint detection and response: What’s important?

Jun 09, 20164 mins
Data and Information SecurityEndpoint ProtectionInternet Security

Enterprise organizations demand EDR products offer scalability, strong data management, flexible analytics and open integration

My colleagues Doug Cahill, Kyle Prigmore and I recently completed a research project on next-generation endpoint security. We determined that there are actually two distinct product categories within next-generation endpoint security: advanced prevention and advanced detection and response (EDR). 

While most firms seem to be gravitating toward advanced prevention, massive enterprise organizations tend to move in the opposite direction by evaluating, testing and deploying EDR products. Why? These organizations have large cybersecurity teams with lots of experience, so they are willing to dedicate resources toward more complex projects.

Furthermore, many of these enterprise organizations are already investing in security analytics by collecting, processing and analyzing data from numerous disparate sources (i.e., network forensics, events/logs, threat intelligence, etc.). Endpoint forensic data is a natural extension of these cybersecurity analytics efforts. 

+ More on Network World: Next-generation endpoint security market bifurcation +

ESG also found that highly experienced cybersecurity analysts are extremely skeptical about every type of threat prevention technology. In their minds, effective threat prevention technologies are a short-term fix at best—a proverbial cybersecurity Band-Aid on the threat landscape bullet hole. 

This thesis states that once any new threat prevention technology gains critical mass, prodigious hackers will find ways to circumvent them. Rather than placing short-term bets on others, these cybersecurity professionals would prefer to double-down on cybersecurity analytics, bolster their ability to detect and respond to cyber attacks, and use homegrown incident detection and response processes to build their own prevention controls along the way.

Numerous EDR products are available today, including those from vendors such as Carbon Black, CounterTack, Crowdstrike, Cybereason, Digital Guardian, Endgame, FireEye, Guidance Software and Hexis Cyber Solutions (now part of Watchguard).  Other vendors monitor some aspects of endpoint behavior as well. So, given all of the choices, what kinds of EDR capabilities are large organizations looking for? Based on our research, ESG believes the best products for advanced detection and response will offer:

  1. Strong data management models. Vendors like to debate each other in this area. Should EDR products sample endpoint data or collect everything that happens on every endpoint? Should the data remain local on the endpoints or migrate to a central analytics server? Enterprise CISOs respond to this question with just one word, “yes.” In other words, EDR products should offer a host of flexible data management options, since all endpoints are not created equally. Large organizations may want to collect and analyze all of the forensic data associated with Active Directory servers but only sample what’s happening on endpoints in the call center. In EDR, data management options and flexibility trumps data management dogma every time.
  2. Massive scale. The enterprises we spoke with in our research project had tens or even hundreds of thousands of endpoints on their networks. Since sophisticated attacks tend to meander from one system to the next, large organizations need EDR products that can track activity across the whole enterprise enchilada, requiring tremendous data management scale. EDR products designed for this type of environment tend have tiered architectures and distributed databases to accommodate these scalability requirements. The best products can also be used for “hunting” activities with ample performance to deliver answers to complex queries with acceptable response times. 
  3. Built-in analytics. While SOC personnel and forensic investigators have their own methodologies and runbooks, they also want their EDR products to bring some supplemental intelligence to the party. This can be anything from cloud-based threat intelligence correlation to machine learning to statistical modeling. Anything that helps them reduce the signal-to-noise ratio is welcome. 
  4. Open integration. Advanced detection and response tools on endpoints must fit gracefully into a broader cybersecurity analytics system, including network forensics, malware analysis, SIEM tools, CMDBs, threat intelligence, etc. Many enterprises are doing further integration by weaving all of these individual components into integrated cybersecurity orchestration platforms (ICOPs) from vendors such as Hexadite, IBM (Resilient Systems), Phantom Cyber and ServiceNow. Given this integration focus, EDR products must come instrumented with open and documented APIs and reference architectures.

Finally, with EDR, it’s not all about products alone. Advanced detection and response vendors should expect extremely demanding and savvy customers, as EDR projects are not for the faint of heart. Therefore, successful EDR vendors will supplement products with hands-on customer service and a willingness to customize their products for specialized requirements and use cases.     

Contributing Writer

Jon Oltsik is a distinguished analyst, fellow, and the founder of the ESG’s cybersecurity service. With over 35 years of technology industry experience, Jon is widely recognized as an expert in all aspects of cybersecurity and is often called upon to help customers understand a CISO's perspective and strategies. Jon focuses on areas such as cyber-risk management, security operations, and all things related to CISOs.

More from this author