The precise circumstances are unclear, but it's becoming obvious that MSE in some cases detects a DOS/Alureon.J infection where none exists It’s looking more and more likely that Microsoft Security Essentials (MSE) is warning about a Trojan:DOS/Alureon.J infection when none exists.On Sept. 16, Microsoft Answers Forum poster ElBanko said that he couldn’t remove an MSE-identified infection of Trojan:DOS/Alureon.J, in spite of repeated scans and removals from multiple packages. According to ElBanko — who appears to be quite knowledgeable:I have run TDSS, Combofix, JunkwareRemovalTool (JRT), MS Malicious Software Removal tool, AdwCleaner, HitManPro, Malwarebytes (MBAM) and searched the registry for any related entries in a manual attempt to delete files related to it – nothing found… MSE is the only product that even identifies it but it does not remove it!On Sept. 23, MVP Le Boule reported:The Microsoft team that is responsible for MSE is aware of the reports of “possible” false detections of Dos/Alureon J and are working to identify and resolve any issue involving the MSE program. Anyone seeing this issue should monitor this thread.Two weeks ago, MVP Kosh Vorlon said: I spoke about it twice more and escalated it further yesterday with Microsoft Management – and yet again just now; however, I have no ETA yet as to when they will respond with an explanation or fix. Please be aware that they certainly know about this thread and they or I will post any updates when they become available.Yesterday Kosh Vorlon posted:I know it’s tough, but we need to be patient. More people are posting and experiencing this and there is still no known solution or even identification of the problem by Microsoft. Also, Microsoft Support will not be able to help here. This should not be happening to this many people and they are not equipped to handle such situations. This issue needs the developers and engineers and I’m having trouble reaching the right people.That’s a lament echoed by many volunteer Microsoft MVPs who monitor the Answers Forum. Is it a false positive or a deeper problem that MSE (and all the major antivirus scanners) can’t solve? Hard to tell, but DOS/Alureon.J figured prominently in MSE circles about 18 months ago. The bleepingcomputer.com site overflows with similar complaints — some of which are, most certainly, not false positives.Is it possible that Microsoft re-released a bad signature for DOS/Alureon.J, one that dates back more than a year, and hasn’t yet pulled the offending signature? If you’re seeing alerts from MSE about DOS:Alureon.J, it would be well worth your while to join the discussion on the Microsoft Answers forum. Related content brandpost Unmasking ransomware threat clusters: Why it matters to defenders Similar patterns of behavior among ransomware treat groups can help security teams better understand and prepare for attacks By Joan Goodchild Sep 21, 2023 3 mins Cybercrime news analysis China’s offensive cyber operations support “soft power” agenda in Africa Researchers track Chinese cyber espionage intrusions targeting African industrial sectors. By Michael Hill Sep 21, 2023 5 mins Advanced Persistent Threats Cyberattacks Critical Infrastructure brandpost Proactive OT security requires visibility + prevention You cannot protect your operation by simply watching and waiting. It is essential to have a defense-in-depth approach. By Austen Byers Sep 21, 2023 4 mins Security news Gitlab fixes bug that exploited internal policies to trigger hostile pipelines It was possible for an attacker to run pipelines as an arbitrary user via scheduled security scan policies. By Shweta Sharma Sep 21, 2023 3 mins Vulnerabilities Podcasts Videos Resources Events SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER From our editors straight to your inbox Get started by entering your email address below. Please enter a valid email address Subscribe