Driving another stake in the heart of online anonymity, credit card companies want to tie your offline shopping history to your online life. How? By taking what they know about you, personal insight gleaned from your offline credit card purchases, and selling it to the highest bidder, so they can stalk you on the web and throw targeted online ads at you. Why? So they can profit at the expense of our privacy, of course. Do you carry cash, or do you buy almost everything with a credit card, perhaps with a debit card backed by a credit card firm such a Visa? If you swipe plastic to pay, do you consider your offline transactions to be private or separate from your online life? If you use Visa or MasterCard, then those credit card companies know a great deal about you and would like to start using what they know about your personal purchasing history to throw targeted online ads at you.There’s a whole bevy of potential ideas to rape and plunder your online experience based off your credit card buying history. Here’s one possible scenario: You super-size your meal at a fast food joint and swipe your credit card to pay, but when you get back to the office, you see targeted online ads about dieting and weight loss. Visa is even considering using your purchasing history to prioritize your search engine results! To that, I would say, “Oh no you don’t!” A dang credit card company deciding the priority of what search results I should see? Time to use cash or bitcoins.Since behavioral ads are appearing on some online banking statements, I suppose I shouldn’t be surprised that Visa and MasterCard would want to raid our online experience with our offline buying history. . . . the better to invade your privacy to make mega bucks off you, my dears.Visa has filed a pile of patents “that provide a blueprint for using credit-card transaction data to target digital ads and personalize other content,” according to the Wall Street Journal. Not to be outdone in the exploiting-consumers’-buying- history scenario, MasterCard shared a presentation with several companies that claimed, “We have extensive data and analytics for enabling precise consumer targeting.” While those documents were “put aside,” MasterCard told WJS, “the strategy has evolved significantly” since April when the documents were created for “exploratory conversations.” Another possibility Visa is considering is “to use cardholders’ anonymous buying histories, in aggregate, to tailor the ads people see online,” the WSJ reported. “That would let advertisers, for instance, show cat-grooming offers to people in one area, and dog-grooming ads to people somewhere else, based on the group buying behavior in the areas as a whole.” This is probably the least offensive of all the scenarios Visa is considering.The abstract for one of Visa’s many patents, System and Methods for Closing the Loop between Online Activities and Offline Purchases, states configuring a computing apparatus to “facilitate the identification of a transaction resulting from an activity occurring in a substantially separate context or environment, such as an offline transaction in ‘brick and mortar’ retail store.” What happens if someone steals your credit card? It’s not worth too much on the black market, but will you then be facing targeted ads from what cybercrooks shopped for with your card? Do you ever shop for someone else, someone sick or elderly for whom you buy articles that you would never buy for yourself? Do you really want those purchases, perhaps adult diapers or denture cream, programmed into your profile and tracking you with those targeted ads?One of the ultra-creepy scenarios proposed by Visa includes building profiles with info scraped and gathered from all sorts of data sources like from DNA databanks, your social media sites, your insurance claims, points, miles and your budget, to name but a few, all done in order to profit and serve up targeted ads to you. WJS mentions other techniques Visa is considering to link Internet users to information about their actual shopping activities. I shudder at the invasive idea of DNA banks and insurance claims being included. In fact, it reminded me a bit of an ancient joke; here’s that flashback to the past:Okay, so it’s not quite the same, but it still reminded me of potential future corporate greed to better profit and to hell with your privacy. Take what Google or Microsoft knows about you, from your email or online searches, and consider that Google previously partnered with MasterCard and Citigroup for mobile payments via NFC on Android smartphones. The blurry line continues to cross between our online and offline lives, so that some day that joke may be a bit like real life. In case you couldn’t tell, I have nothing nice to say about Visa and MasterCard’s “holy grail” idea to sell what they know about you from each and every swipe of plastic to pay for your transactions. To me, it’s like stabbing a knife into the heart of anonymity and decimating privacy by dragging our offline life online to better track and target ads. All of the patents are listed on WSJ.Like this? Here’s more posts: Facebook Wants to Issue Your IRL Offline ID & Internet Driver’s LicenseSkype Exploits: I know where you are, what you are sharing, and how to best stalk you FBI rolling out nationwide face search and recognition system Future TSA: Track All ‘Daily Travels To Work, Grocery Stores & Social Events’ Privacy Nightmare: Data Mine & Analyze all College Students’ Online Activities Double Security Whammy, No Patches: Killer SSL DDoS Attack, XML Encryption Broken ACLU to Congress: Cancer of Gov’t Secrecy Is Killing America You might be a terrorist if you take a photo or film at Mall of AmericaPROTECT-IP or control freaks? Monster Cable blacklists Sears, Facebook as rogue sites Microsoft Security Summary: Don’t Sweat 0-days & Wise Up Stupid and Lazy Users! 4Chan Founder Moot Cherishes Choices: ‘Facebook and Google Do Identity Wrong’Reimagining Microsoft without Ballmer: Employees left company meeting ‘in droves’ Follow me on Twitter @PrivacyFanatic Related content news Dow Jones watchlist of high-risk businesses, people found on unsecured database A Dow Jones watchlist of 2.4 million at-risk businesses, politicians, and individuals was left unprotected on public cloud server. By Ms. Smith Feb 28, 2019 4 mins Data Breach Hacking Security news Ransomware attacks hit Florida ISP, Australian cardiology group Ransomware attacks might be on the decline, but that doesn't mean we don't have new victims. A Florida ISP and an Australian cardiology group were hit recently. By Ms. Smith Feb 27, 2019 4 mins Ransomware Security news Bare-metal cloud servers vulnerable to Cloudborne flaw Researchers warn that firmware backdoors planted on bare-metal cloud servers could later be exploited to brick a different customer’s server, to steal their data, or for ransomware attacks. By Ms. Smith Feb 26, 2019 3 mins Cloud Computing Security news Meet the man-in-the-room attack: Hackers can invisibly eavesdrop on Bigscreen VR users Flaws in Bigscreen could allow 'invisible Peeping Tom' hackers to eavesdrop on Bigscreen VR users, to discreetly deliver malware payloads, to completely control victims' computers and even to start a worm infection spreading through VR By Ms. Smith Feb 21, 2019 4 mins Hacking Vulnerabilities Security Podcasts Videos Resources Events SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER From our editors straight to your inbox Get started by entering your email address below. Please enter a valid email address Subscribe