Malware used in attack on PHP last month d믭 DGA.Changer Malware utilized in the attack last month on the developers’ site PHP.net used a unique approach to avoid detection, a security expert says. [Adobe Reader X sandbox bypassed by zero-day flaw]On Wednesday, security vendor Seculert reported finding that one of five malware types used in the attack had a unique cloaking property for evading sandboxes. The company called the malware DGA.Changer. DGA.Changer’s only purpose was to download other malware onto infected computers, Aviv Raff, chief technology officer for Seculert, said on the company’s blog. Seculert identified 6,500 compromised computers communicating with the malware’s command and control server. Almost 60 percent were in the United States. What Seculert found unique was how the malware could receive a command from a C&C server to change the seed of the software’s domain generation algorithm. The DGA periodically generates a large number of domain names as potential communication points to the C&C server, thereby making it difficult for researchers and law enforcement to find the right domain and possibly shutdown the botnet. “What the attackers behind DGA did is basically change the algorithm on the fly, so they can tell the malware to create a new stream of domains automatically,” Raff told CSOonline. When the malware generates the same list of domains, it can be detected in the sandbox where security technology will isolate suspicious files. However, changing the algorithm on demand means that the malware won’t be identified. “This is a new capability that didn’t exist before,” Raff said. “This capability allows the attacker to bypass sandbox technology.” Hackers working for a nation-state targeting specific entities, such as government agencies, think tanks or international corporations, would use this type of malware, according to Raff. Called advanced persistent threats, these hackers tend to use sophisticated attack tools. An exploit kit that served five different malware types was used in compromising two servers of PHP.net, a site for downloads and documentation related to the PHP general-purpose scripting language used in Web development. Google spotted four pages on the site serving malicious JavaScript that targeted personal computers, but ignored mobile devices. The attack was noteworthy because of the number of visitors to PHP.net, which is in the top 250 domains on the Internet, according to Alexa rankings. To defend against DGA.Changer, companies would need a tool that looks for abnormal behavior in network traffic. The malware tends to generate unusual traffic by querying lots of domains in search of the one leading to the C&C server. [Exploring the influence of Finjan’s proactive content security]“Because this malware will try to go to different domains, it will generate suspicious traffic,” Raff said. Seculert did not find any evidence that would indicate who was behind the PHP.net attack. “This is a group that’s continuously updating this malicious software, so this is a work in progress,” Raff said. Related content feature Top cybersecurity M&A deals for 2023 Fears of recession, rising interest rates, mass tech layoffs, and conservative spending trends are likely to make dealmakers cautious, but an ever-increasing need to defend against bigger and faster attacks will likely keep M&A activity steady in By CSO Staff Sep 22, 2023 24 mins Mergers and Acquisitions Mergers and Acquisitions Mergers and Acquisitions brandpost Unmasking ransomware threat clusters: Why it matters to defenders Similar patterns of behavior among ransomware treat groups can help security teams better understand and prepare for attacks By Joan Goodchild Sep 21, 2023 3 mins Cybercrime news analysis China’s offensive cyber operations support “soft power” agenda in Africa Researchers track Chinese cyber espionage intrusions targeting African industrial sectors. By Michael Hill Sep 21, 2023 5 mins Advanced Persistent Threats Cyberattacks Critical Infrastructure brandpost Proactive OT security requires visibility + prevention You cannot protect your operation by simply watching and waiting. It is essential to have a defense-in-depth approach. By Austen Byers Sep 21, 2023 4 mins Security Podcasts Videos Resources Events SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER From our editors straight to your inbox Get started by entering your email address below. Please enter a valid email address Subscribe