Users of Megaupload's storage service who were not engaged in copyright infringement are suing to regain access to their files The Electronic Frontier Foundation will head to court on Friday to push the federal government to establish a process that will enable law-abiding Megaupload users to get their files back. The U.S. government has accused Megaupload of facilitating widespread copyright infringement and shut the site down in January. Even so, some Megaupload customers used its services to back up and share files that belonged to them or represented fair use of copyright material.The EFF will ask the court on Friday to create a process by which these legitimate users can retrieve their files. The nonprofit is representing Kyle Goodwin, an “interested party” in the case against Megaupload and its founder, Kim Dotcom. Goodwin, a video journalist who covers high school sports, used a Megaupload premium account to store duplicates of his videos. When his hard drive crashed, Goodwin was left with no access to his work product. The hosting company claims it has no access to user data. So should users of cloud storage services fear that their data, too, could become collateral damage in a case against copyright infringement? “I think this case raises pretty serious questions about what happens when you store your data in the cloud and for whatever reason the government or the company decides they’re not going to store your data anymore,” said EFF spokeswoman Rebecca Jeschke. Most Megaupload users would not have expected to lose their files as a result of infringement by others, said Jefferson Scher, an intellectual property attorney with Carr and Ferrell.“There’s a conception that on most of these sites, the problems that are created by user A won’t affect user B. This is one of the few times, other than something like Napster, which completely went out of business, where the other users really were affected. It is a bit of a surprise,” said Scher. Establishing a process to let law-abiding users retrieve their data is a good idea, he said. And as the government continues to address digital copyright issues, he added, “there needs to be clearer criteria and consideration of the potential innocent victims before a domain is seized and a site is shut down completely.”Cameron Scott covers search, web services and privacy for The IDG News Service. Follow Cameron on Twitter at CScott_IDG. Related content news UK government plans 2,500 new tech recruits by 2025 with focus on cybersecurity New apprenticeships and talent programmes will support recruitment for in-demand roles such as cybersecurity technologists and software developers By Michael Hill Sep 29, 2023 4 mins Education Industry Education Industry Education Industry news UK data regulator orders end to spreadsheet FOI requests after serious data breaches The Information Commissioner’s Office says alternative approaches should be used to publish freedom of information data to mitigate risks to personal information By Michael Hill Sep 29, 2023 3 mins Government Cybercrime Data and Information Security feature Cybersecurity startups to watch for in 2023 These startups are jumping in where most established security vendors have yet to go. By CSO Staff Sep 29, 2023 19 mins CSO and CISO Security news analysis Companies are already feeling the pressure from upcoming US SEC cyber rules New Securities and Exchange Commission cyber incident reporting rules don't kick in until December, but experts say they highlight the need for greater collaboration between CISOs and the C-suite By Cynthia Brumfield Sep 28, 2023 6 mins Regulation Data Breach Financial Services Industry Podcasts Videos Resources Events SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER From our editors straight to your inbox Get started by entering your email address below. Please enter a valid email address Subscribe