Satellite images of Mother Earth have come to the people, and several governments are not happy about it. The launch of Google Earth in June made it possible for anyone with Internet access to view just about any part of the surface of the earth, including strategic military locations. The satellites can focus in on government buildings, energy facilities, utilities, even homes.The criticism started in August when Frans Weekers and Aleid Wolfson, members of the Dutch Parliament, questioned whether free imagery of the world might be a handy tool for terrorists, providing aerial photographs of potential targets. They called on the Dutch government to take appropriate action against Google.More recently, Thailand demanded action from Washington. Maj. Gen. Weerasak Manee-in, a Thai Armed Forces spokesman, said his nation wanted restrictions on the detailed images, especially state buildings. He suggested that Google be allowed to show only images of tourist attractions. South Korea, which is technically still at war with its neighbor to the north, is also concerned about images of government buildings, military bases and the defense security command.Satellite imagery programs also have private security firms concerned. George Miserendino, President and owner of Triton Security Solutions and a former security executive with the U.S. Department of Energy, agrees that Google Earth and similar products present a potential risk. “It provides a detailed layout of the physical features of plants, generators and substations, access roads and surrounding areas that could be used for cover, concealment, surveillance, even thievery,” he said. Miserendino thinks that electric and utility associations should request that images of their facilities be obscured or eliminated. Some governmental agencies see no danger. Australia’s Nuclear Science and Technology Organization, which operates the only nuclear reactor down under, said Google posed no risk because the images were old and did not expose any critical infrastructure. Google officials stated they try to update their imagery at least once every 18 months.There are other security officials who say the information can actually be helpful. Mark Goodman, Onslow County Director of Emergency Services and Homeland Security in North Carolina, uses the program to help with emergency planning. Goodman said the images are not clear enough to present a security risk. Does Google Earth make the world safer? Or more dangerous? What do you think? Related content feature Top cybersecurity M&A deals for 2023 Fears of recession, rising interest rates, mass tech layoffs, and conservative spending trends are likely to make dealmakers cautious, but an ever-increasing need to defend against bigger and faster attacks will likely keep M&A activity steady in By CSO Staff Sep 22, 2023 24 mins Mergers and Acquisitions Mergers and Acquisitions Mergers and Acquisitions brandpost Unmasking ransomware threat clusters: Why it matters to defenders Similar patterns of behavior among ransomware treat groups can help security teams better understand and prepare for attacks By Joan Goodchild Sep 21, 2023 3 mins Cybercrime news analysis China’s offensive cyber operations support “soft power” agenda in Africa Researchers track Chinese cyber espionage intrusions targeting African industrial sectors. By Michael Hill Sep 21, 2023 5 mins Advanced Persistent Threats Cyberattacks Critical Infrastructure brandpost Proactive OT security requires visibility + prevention You cannot protect your operation by simply watching and waiting. It is essential to have a defense-in-depth approach. By Austen Byers Sep 21, 2023 4 mins Security Podcasts Videos Resources Events SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER From our editors straight to your inbox Get started by entering your email address below. Please enter a valid email address Subscribe