Source: [id: 41018; name: CSO; isActive: true; siteId: 3] -- CSO -- $content.altguid

Flap Over Transit Flaws Exposes Disclosure Divide

A court order put a stop to a planned presentation at the Defcon hackers convention by three MIT students who found security flaws in the electronic ticketing system used by the mass transit authority in Boston

By Jaikumar Vijayan, Computerworld

August 19, 2008 — CSO —

A court order put a stop to a planned presentation at the Defcon hackers convention by three MIT students who found security flaws in the electronic ticketing system used by the mass transit authority in Boston. But the ruling reopened the schism in the IT security community over the issue of how vulnerabilities should be publicly disclosed.

Critics of the temporary restraining order, issued on Aug. 9, by a federal judge in Boston, labeled it an infringement of the students' First Amendment rights and an example of prior restraint on free speech. Many said such actions leave vulnerable systems open to attackers and put a chill on security research, driving legitimate researchers underground.

Others, though, saw the case involving the students and the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) as another example of publicity-hungry security researchers driven more by ego and the desire for fame than by any sincere interest in improving security. The disclosure debate boiled over again after the MBTA obtained the 10-day order barring the MIT undergrads -- Zack Anderson, Russell "RJ" Ryan and Alessandro Chiesa -- from publicly disclosing information about the flaws in its e-ticketing system. The gag order was handed down the day before a scheduled Defcon session in which the students planned to detail the holes, which they said they found during independent penetration testing.

In an affidavit, the MBTA claimed that the students didn't give it sufficient information about the vulnerabilities beforehand. The transit authority added that it wasn't trying to permanently gag the students, but that it wanted some time to determine the validity and seriousness of the flaws and a course of action for addressing them.

But the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), a high-tech civil rights group that is defending the three students, contended that the gag order was unconstitutional and wholly unnecessary. Some of the material that the students planned to present had been previously published elsewhere, the EFF noted. And, it said, the students had told the MBTA that they wouldn't release technical details that hackers could use to take advantage of the flaws.

Bruce Schneier, chief security technology officer at BT Group PLC, joined 10 computer science professors and researchers in signing a letter opposing the restraining order that the EFF included as part of a motion to reconsider the decision. Schneier said last week that publicly disclosing vulnerabilities is often the only way to prod businesses to address them. "Companies won't make [their systems] better by themselves," Schneier said. MBTA officials, he claimed, "are counting on the legal system to protect their shoddy work" on IT security.