$content.source -- $content.source.name -- $content.altguid

Risk Assessment Tool: Application for Removable Device Media

An excerpt from the form that the City of London uses to decide whether or not to grant officers permission to download data onto portable media

Page 3

Part 3: Risk/Benefit Comparison

When officers at the City of London police wish to download information onto a portable media device, they must file a formal application to do so. Based on the scores assessed in parts one and two, this is the criteria decision-makers use to compare the risks and benefits of the proposed data download. (To read about how the police force uses the tool, see "How To Tell If That USB Download Is Really Worth the Security Risk.")

This section defines how the scoring from the risk and benefits sections are compared. This section is included for informational purposes only and is used only by the decision maker.  It is included to demonstrate transparency of process. The following table is intended to give guidance on the trade off between risk and benefit. It also defines the levels of approval required for the business case dependent on risk.

Benefit Risk

0-45

45-200

200+

< 20

Rejected
Insufficient Benefit

Rejected
Insufficient Benefit

Rejected
Unacceptable risk

Between 20 & 40

Low risk & BenefitAuthority

Rejected
Disproportionate risks to benefit

Rejected
Unacceptable risk

Between 40 & 60

Acceptable
ISO Authority

Medium Risk & Benefit
Information Manager Authority

Rejected
Unacceptable risk

60+

Acceptable
ISO Authority

Acceptable
ISO Authority

High Risk & Benefit
Information Management Board Authority


RESOURCE CENTER