Source: [id: 41018; name: CSO; isActive: true; siteId: 3] -- CSO -- $content.altguid

Opinion: Cutting Security Costs Won't Recession-Proof Your Company

Got the recession blues? Need to shave expenses? Guest columnist Ben Rothke says you should turn off the heat before you cut security staff

By Ben Rothke

February 06, 2008CSO

As 2008 starts, the short-term economic outlook is not pretty. Whether you call it a recession or a correction, the reality is that profits are down, bankruptcies are up, foreclosures are soaring, and the overall economic outlook is bleak. Companies are responding by cutting back IT budgets and staff.

With all of the cost cutting and layoffs, information security is one area that can’t afford to be cut.

First off, since 2001 CERT has argued that the insider is the most insidious security threat. (www.cert.org/insider_threat) Insiders can be current or former employees and contractors who have (or had) authorized access to their organization’s system and networks. Access plus a familiarity with internal policies, procedures, and technologies can enable these individuals to conduct attacks or collude with external attackers.

With projects being cut, organizations will naturally take the opportunity to release associated contractors and staff. Some of these people will transform from trusted insider to malicious outsider. Security incidents naturally rise during times of trouble with disgruntled staff. Significantly, it’s not just actual terminations that create security concerns - the mere threat of job loss can drive trusted employees to do nefarious things. In January of this year, a Florida woman reportedly saw a help-wanted ad in the newspaper for a position that looked like her current job, and even had her boss’s phone number listed.  Assuming she was about to be terminated, she allegedly went to the architectural office where she worked and deleted seven years worth of drawings and blueprints, worth an estimated $2.5 million. (The job posting was in fact for the company of the boss’s wife.)

It is at times like these where more information security is actually needed to handle the rise in incidents. Having a reduced staff only raises the probability that such incidents will be overlooked or not handled until the damage is done.
The mission-critical aspect of information security should be seen like the heat in your building. It is an integral part of the infrastructure and working environment, and the idea of cutting it should be non-negotiable.

Pragmatic organizations, especially those within the financial services sector, are battle tested enough to know that cutting back on information security is imprudent. Organizations that follow their lead won’t suffer the inevitable outcome of those that are shortsighted enough to pursue a short-term cost savings by cutting their information security staffs. #

Ben Rothke, CISSP, QSA, is a Senior Security Consultant with BT INS and the author of Computer Security: 20 Things Every Employee Should Know. Reach him at ben.rothke@bt.com.

Read more about metrics/budgets in CSOonline's Metrics/Budgets section.

RESOURCE CENTER